Also, the paper was intended for oral delivery and so avoids possible tongue-twisters.
Also, the paper was intended for oral delivery and so avoids possible tongue-twisters. However, sincethe year that he published In Face of Mysterymuch of the scholarly engagement with his work has focused on this text and those that followed.
However, I want to argue An essay on theological method kaufman renewed attention to the second, or personalist, phase of his theology. First, during his personalist phase, Kaufman designed his theological method to facilitate the construction of God-concepts ranging from a sparse God to an Agent-God.
This method is of special interest to theists who seek to construct, or more likely re-construct, a concept of God which is existentially meaningful, comforting in times of suffering, and which serves as an ultimate reference point.
His method, during this phase, is open to diverse religious and theological perspectives and to perspectives from science and secular humanism. In this phase of his work, Kaufman holds that the only God available to human beings is the concept of God that we imaginatively construct.
For Kaufman, as for Kant, theology is above all a practical discipline GP, Indeed, these metaphors are also comforting to many in times of suffering.
This mix of symbols and narratives often originate from multiple traditions including traditions previously considered non-religious. Because, during this phase, his method is intentionally open to diverse religious and theological perspectives as well as to perspectives from science and secular humanism.
Indeed, Kaufman assumes that encounters with other worldviews are important. These encounters, he believes, are bound to lead to discriminating and informed judgments about what is humanly significant.
The coming new age of a thoroughly interconnected and interdependent worldwide humanity must build upon the best insights and disciplines of all our long and varied human experience, as conserved for us in the many religious and cultural traditions alive and meaningful today.
We must be open to all, in conversation with all GMD, No doubt, picking and choosing from various models and images can lead to God-constructs that are formulated in terms of human needs and desires. As I mentioned earlier, Kaufman finds nothing strange about this.
It is the humanizing motif that tends to introduce anthropomorphism into a concept of God. In addition, the humanizing motif enables theists with a pic-n-mix religiosity to adjudicate between symbols, ideals, and artifacts and decide which to incorporate or remove from their hybrid God-constructs.
As an ultimate reference point, the concept of God calls into question all of our projects, values, and goals. The humanizing and relativizing motifs are connected.
If a God-concept is properly constructed, the two motifs operate as a powerful dialectic internal to its structure. I want to underscore the point that, during his personalist phase, Kaufman held that an anthropomorphic concept of God is not necessarily anthropo-centric.
In fact, it is designed to fight against anthropocentrism. It is true that he eventually decided that human beings are unable to resist 1 giving God-constructs ontological status and 2 reifying the anthropomorphic attributes of God-constructs.
The only reliable way to deflate these impulses, he decided, was to make an impersonal God the proper object of devotion.
Thus did Kaufman abandon his personalist phase. These considerations led him to the naturalist phase of his theology. This phase offers the possibility of constructing a wide range of God-concepts while also designed to defeat Feuerbachian God-concepts.
The humanizing motif inspires theists to become more humane and to fulfill their highest potential; the relativizing motif calls the God-concept into question as well all of our projects, values, and norms.
In Face of Reality: The Constructive Theology of Gordon D.
God as Problem and Possibility: Varieties of Religion Today: Harvard University Press, A Historicist Perspective New York: Constructing the Concept of God Philadelphia: Christian Theology in a Pluralistic World Minneapolis:Gordon Kaufman, An Essay on Theological Method, 3 rd ed.
(Scholars Press / American Academy of Religion, ). Philip Satterthwaite and David Wright, eds., A Pathway into the Holy Scripture (Eerdmans, ). Oct 01, · While Kaufman's work, In Face of Mystery, qualifies and deepens the programmatic proposa While Kaufman's work, In Face of Mystery, qualifies and deepens the programmatic proposals offered in An Essay on Theological Method, the earlier book nevertheless remains a sound and accessible statement on theological method by one of America's most distinguished theologians/5.
an essay on theological method kaufman; write your essay; examples of discursive essays higher english; How To Write A Good Essay For High School. THEOLOGICAL METHOD - Northwestern College Gordon Kaufman, An Essay on Theological Method, 3 rd ed.
(Scholars Press / American Academy of Religion, ). Philip Satterthwaite and David Wright, eds., A Pathway into the Holy Scripture (Eerdmans, Bucher, Glenn R. "Theological Method in Liberation Theologies: Cone, Russell, and Gutierrez." American Academy of Religion, Philosophy of Religion and Theology Proceedings (): Bultmann, Rudolf.
Research study of a contextual theology developed by a cultural, or local interest group--articulating major issues addressed, methods used, and theological themes.